Lindell Law Offices, PLLC - Eric W. Lindell, Attorney at Law

LINDELL LAW OFFICES, PLLCLINDELL LAW OFFICES, PLLC

seamerc.gif (5478 bytes)

 

Lindell Law Offices, PLLC - Eric W. Lindell, Attorney at Law

Lindell Law Offices, PLLC
Eric W. Lindell - Bio
Information
Contact Lindell Law Offices, PLLC
Criminal Cases - Lindell Law Offices, PLLC
Civil Cases - Lindell Law Offices, PLLC
Links - Lindell Law Offices, PLLC

 

Lindell Law Offices, PLLC

4409 California Ave SW Suite 100

Seattle, WA 98116

206.230.4922

Fax: 206.937.2119

 

E-Mail Contact

Eric Lindell

Attorney at Law

 


contact@lindelllaw.com

 

 


 

 

Lindell Law Offices, PLLC © 2009


 

MIRANDA RIGHTS

 

The Right to Remain Silent:

The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that, "[N]o person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself."  Similarly Article I, Section 9 of Washington's Constitution provides that "no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to give evidence against himself…".  As a suspect in a crime, you are not obligated to provide the police with a statement.  If you exercise your right to remain silent, absent other circumstances, that silence cannot be used against you at trial.

 

What are the Miranda Warnings?

The United States Supreme Court has determined that the prohibition against self-incrimination contained in the Fifth Amendment requires that any custodial interrogation by law enforcement officers be preceded by the now familiar Miranda warnings.  The Miranda case provides that prior to interrogation of a defendant who is in custody "or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way", the police must warn him  or her that (1)he has the right to remain silent; (2) that any statement he makes may be used as evidence against him; (3)that he is entitled to consult with a lawyer and have a lawyer with him during police interrogation; (4) than a lawyer will be provided for him if he can't afford one; and, (5) that he may exercise any of these rights at any point during the interrogation. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 471, 86 S. Ct. 1602 (1966).  The Miranda warnings are designed to protect the defendant's Fifth Amendment right against self -incrimination resulting from either coercion or deceptive police practices that occur in-custody interrogations.  See, Heinmand v. Whitman County, 105 Wn.2d 796, 718 P. 2d 789 (1986).

 

 

 

 

HOME BIOGRAPHY INFORMATION CONTACT CRIMINAL CASES CIVIL CASES LINKS